Spectrum & PolicyFccTv Ownership CapCable IndustryBroadcast Regulation
Ten Cable Orgs Threaten FCC Lawsuit Over 39% TV Ownership Cap Repeal
Ten state and regional cable groups petitioned the FCC on October 2 for a stay against the repeal of the 39% national TV ownership cap, warning they will seek judicial review in an appeals court if the agency does not act before the order takes effect 60 days after Federal Regist
Spectrum & PolicyWhy it matters
- Ten state and regional cable organizations filed an October 2 petition seeking a stay and injunction against the FCC's repeal of the 39% national TV ownership cap.
- The FCC order was published in the Federal Register on October 2 and takes effect 60 days later.
- FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez called the repeal "unlawful" and argued only Congress can modify the cap set by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004.
- The Nexstar-Tegna merger, which exceeded the 39% cap, preceded the FCC vote and faces separate antitrust challenges.
- The American Television Alliance and Free Press have also signaled opposition, leaving the broadcast cap fight likely to move to federal appeals court before year-end.
The story
Ten state and regional cable industry organizations filed a petition with the FCC on October 2 demanding a stay and injunction against the agency's repeal of the 39% national TV ownership cap, setting the stage for a federal court showdown once the order appears in the Federal Register.
The petition, signed by groups representing operators in Pennsylvania, Washington, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New England and Virginia, leaves little doubt about the next step. "If the Commission has not ruled on this stay petition by the date on which the Order is published in the Federal Register, Petitioners will conclude that the agency has 'denied the motion or failed to afford the relief requested' and seek a judicial stay," the organizations wrote.
What changed at the FCC?
The FCC voted roughly two months ago to scrap the 39% cap and replace it with a "granular, case-by-case" review of broadcast TV transactions. Under the new framework, the agency said it would "approve deals that promote the public interest while allowing the agency to reject any deals that do not meet the standard." The order was published in the Federal Register on October 2 and takes effect 60 days later.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr argued the case-by-case model would help level the playing field between broadcasters and other TV distributors and programmers, including virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) such as YouTube TV. The vote came shortly after the FCC cleared the Nexstar-Tegna merger and waived the ownership cap for that transaction, a deal that itself pushed past 39% and now faces separate antitrust challenges in court.
Who is opposing the repeal, and on what grounds?
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, the agency's lone Democrat, called the move "unlawful," saying it bypassed a full Commission vote and stepped on a statutory ownership cap. She and other critics maintain that Congress — not the FCC — holds the authority to waive broadcast ownership rules.
The cable petitioners echo that position. They point to the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004, which codified the 39% cap, and argue the Commission lacks power to modify, waive or eliminate it. The FCC's order counters that the agency "has the authority and obligation to reexamine the national cap rule in response to changing circumstances and to modify or repeal it if it no longer serves the public interest."
What do cable operators say is at stake?
The ten state and regional groups argue that loosening the cap will drive up retransmission consent fees paid by MVPDs, lift pay-TV bills for consumers, and raise the risk of "widespread blackouts" of broadcast stations carried on cable systems. They accuse the FCC's order of "dismiss[ing] these affordability concerns" without adequate examination.
The American Television Alliance (ATVA) — whose members include ACA Connects, NTCA and several large cable and telecom operators — condemned the plan in July, warning that expanding the cap would damage localism and viewpoint diversity rather than serve it. Public-interest group Free Press has likewise threatened to challenge the FCC in court over the same issue.
Which organizations signed the petition?
- Broadband Communications Association of Pennsylvania
- Broadband Communications Association of Washington
- Colorado Cable Telecommunications Association
- Florida Internet and Television Association
- Indiana Cable and Broadband Association
- Michigan Cable Telecommunications Association
- Minnesota Cable Communications Association
- Mississippi Internet and Television
- New England Connectivity and Telecommunications Association
- VCTA – Broadband Association of Virginia
What happens next?
If the FCC does not grant the stay before the order's 60-day window closes, the cable coalition will file for judicial review in a federal appeals court. With mediation deadlines already running through November 4 in the parallel Dish Chapter 11 proceedings and the Nexstar-Tegna antitrust cases progressing on a separate track, the broadcast ownership fight is on track to migrate from the FCC to the courts well before the end of the year.
Also reported
Original: fcc.gov